May 15th, 2008

Domestic partnerships are not a good enough substitute for marriage, the justices ruled 4-3 in striking down the ban. "In view of the substance and significance of the fundamental constitutional right to form a family relationship," Chief Justice Ronald M. George wrote of marriage for the majority, "the California Constitution properly must be interpreted to guarantee this basic civil right to all Californians, whether gay or heterosexual, and to same-sex couples as well as to opposite-sex couples."
Read the full story
Sphere: Related Content
Posted in gay+marriage, civil+unions, california, supreme+court, u.s.+news | No Comments » | Post to NewsCloud »